Clean, Intelligent and Information-Based

A New Drill and The Pillars of The PLA

Authors

A deputy brigade commander stands on a training ground in the 82nd Group Army based in central China, operating uncrewed mine-clearing equipment alongside his officers. “He is not just observing – he is testing the machinery, working through problems, and staying late to solve coordination issues between crewed and uncrewed systems.”

This might sound like a normal day in military training. But the report published in the PLA Daily on April 20, 2026, is actually speaking to the very real problems the Chinese military faces with how it tests, buys, and deploys new equipment, and how they could be fixed.

Operational Objective

The article doesn’t explicitly name what is being tested, but it could be autonomous ground vehicles designed to work alongside human operators, specifically in mine clearance and obstacle breaching missions. These systems are described as “highly intelligent and information-based,” but they struggle with communication in complex terrain, and have coordination problems with standard military-grade vehicles that accompany them, like the Mengshi Dongfeng multi-role tactical vehicle with a 4x4 chassis.

The key emphasis here is on the concept of “manned-unmanned teaming” (MUM-T; 有人-无人协同), and its deployment in high-risk operations where crewed platforms detect and communicate, while uncrewed platforms engage in mine clearing. The articulations of the report also signal that the PLA is not close to complete autonomy, but is open to experimenting with it across the board.

The Corruption Angle

What is one of the most fascinating things about the reportage is what it reveals between the lines. There’s a moment described where the uncrewed system’s manufacturer’s technician pulls the deputy brigade commander aside and quietly asks him to “ease up” (能不能松松手，关照一下) while testing the system in a mine-clearing operation. The operation itself was not going well, and it was causing the manufacturer, who had come to see his product tested, anxiety. The situation is described as:

Seeing that the explosive ordnance disposal training ground was covered with barbed wire, tetrahedral obstacles, and trenches—and that the test was not being conducted “on flat ground” as the manufacturer had envisioned, a company technician grew somewhat anxious.

Earlier in the text, the article references people who were disciplined for “engaging in lavish meals and drinks with factory personnel, showing favouritism, and turning a blind eye to substandard equipment.” Essentially, the manufacturer’s technician was either testing the deputy brigade commander or actually wanted the testing ground modified, in that they hoped it would be a “flat surface” instead of the “realistic conditions” that the actual mission would face. Of course, the commander himself is reported safe because he has learned his lessons across a wave of anti-corruption training cycles.

Why Combat Realism Actually Matters

One of the deputy brigade commander’s key lines in the article is worth quoting directly:

Equipment testing is a process of discovering and solving problems. If it doesn’t meet the requirements, we continue to improve and upgrade it. If we lower the standards to pass the test, and the issued equipment doesn’t meet combat requirements, it will not only waste a lot of manpower, material resources, and financial resources, but may also lead to combat defeat and endanger the lives of officers and soldiers.”

Essentially, beyond any rhetoric, it reads like an acknowledgement that the PLA has probably deployed equipment that didn’t meet combat standards in the past, and that there was a cost to that. Whether it was equipment sitting in warehouses unused, or systems that failed when actually needed, the implication is that lowering testing standards has had real consequences vis-à-vis creating a rightful combat validation environment.

More Than Morale

The article spends a lot of time on the deputy brigade commander’s leadership style – how he operates equipment himself, stays on the training ground, and works alongside technicians. The fact that he is not sitting on cushions in a protected command-control station far away is supposed to send to the grassroots the message that senior will be held to higher standards now. And given the PLA and the Central Military Commission’s recent trysts with poor leadership, whether militarily or politically, it is no surprise that the story is woven around the commander’s persona.