The Jamaat ud-Dawwa (JuD) recently published an “open letter” to Pakistan’s parliament, protesting its decision to restore on-land NATO supply routes and “conditional re-engagement” with the U.S. This “open letter,” brought to light by journalist Omar Quraishi, was pasted outside one of Karachi’s most upscale stores (اردو). LT @Vikram_Sood.
As you are aware, the Parliamentary Committee on National Security (PCNS) has presented its recommendations on relations with the U.S. and the issue of NATO’s supply lines during the joint parliamentary session on March 20, 2012. News reports indicate that NATO supply lines are being restored due to U.S. pressure. It is also allegedly being proposed that taxes on NATO supplies be increased and that 50 per cent of the traffic be transported via rail.
The Difa-e-Pakistan Council has already communicated its thoughts to the Parliament on the above proposals, and would further like to remind the Parliament that:
- Parvez Musharraf entered into secret and verbal agreements with the U.S. that provided the Americans with facilities that ultimately were detrimental to our own security and to the security of our Afghan brothers. However, if these agreements are now being given formal consent via the Parliament, it sets a very dangerous precedent.
- The East India Company had also entered into similar agreements with the Mughal Empire, which resulted in the colonization of India. Thus, if the Parliament accedes to these agreements, it will no doubt result in the colonization of Pakistan by the U.S. and Europe.
- We must not neglect to remember that if the Parliament were to reauthorize on-land access routes to NATO, it will negatively impact our relations with China.
- The bold decision of the government to ban NATO supply routes after the Salala incident brought confidence to the people of Pakistan. However, if these routes were to be reauthorized, it would create confusion and instability in our country.
- The routes to West Asia and Afghanistan being authorized to India are even far more dangerous than the routes being authorized to the U.S. and NATO. The U.S. and India have recently concluded joint military exercises in Rajasthan. Granting India route access to Afghanistan via Pakistan and entering into trade agreements with that country present a security threat to Pakistan and risks annoying friendly nations such as China.
- We must also remember that NATO containers travel through all provinces of Pakistan and have previously been targeted. Thus, if the supply lines were restored and the trucks targeted again, the U.S. might use such an act to bring in its own troops into Pakistani territory on the excuse that they are not confident of the security being provided by the Pakistani armed forces.
- The U.S. has never honored any of its agreements with Pakistan. It instead turned around and blamed Pakistan for the Salala altercation. Are we about to endorse these actions, and that too via our own Parliament? Would this happen, Pakistan will be engulfed yet again by the flames of terrorism fanned by the likes of the U.S., NATO and India. [Source]
The “open letter” is interesting because where India and the U.S. are concerned, LeT/JuD (unlike other jihadi outfits) has seldom differed with sponsors in Rawalpindi. However, it would also be nearly impossible for a decision in Pakistan’s parliament to have been concluded on the future of ties with the U.S. and on NATO supply routes without consultation and approval from GHQ.
Effectively, the GHQ is being drawn into making compromises on U.S. demands out of reluctance yet again, as it was at the beginning of U.S. operations in Afghanistan in 2001. It has since pursued a policy of supporting U.S.-led operations, while covertly attempting to undermine them. Lt. Gen. Nadeem Taj’s antics, the Haqqani network’s activities inside Afghanistan and Osama bin Laden’s discovery in Abbottabad are but examples of Pakistan’s attempts at subversion.
While Rawalpindi might have agreed prima facie to restore NATO supply routes, it does so out of necessity and with every intention to keep the pressure on the U.S. and allied forces with 2014 in mind. To that end, it might employ a series of agents to do its bidding. Historically, groups such as the LeT have been primarily been India-focused. But this might be changing if Rawalpindi is committed to temporary bonhomie with India. The recent attacks by the Taliban in Kabul and not-s0-subtle threats in bullet #6 above might be harbingers of a dangerous summer.