Indian agencies have known Mr. Fai was up to no-good for ages.
We’re just being made aware of the arrest in the U.S. of Ghulam Nabi Fai, Executive Director of the Kashmiri-American Council (KAC) for allegedly being on the payroll of the ISI and hiding millions of dollars for illegal lobbying. A second individual, Zaheer Ahmed, has also been charged. The FBI affidavit cites that Mr. Fai conspired “to act as an agent of a foreign principal…to falsify, conceal, and cover up materials by tricks, schemes, and devices…” (FBI affidavit, LT @Colinfreeze).
Mr. Fai is also no stranger to the FBI. When questioned in 2007, he contented that he had “never met anyone who identified himself as being affiliated with the ISI.” Mr. Fai has long been at the forefront of the “Kashmir movement” in the U.S., portraying himself as a Kashmiri-American champion on Kashmir, independent of any affiliation of Pakistan or its agencies. In fact, CBS’s news report on the arrest identified Mr. Fai as a “Virginia man.”
But Indian security agencies have long confirmed Mr. Fai’s nexus with Pakistan’s ISI. A 2004 Times of India report revealed the relationship between Mr. Fai, the Tehrik-e-Hurriyat and the ISI:
This is part of Islamabad’s plan to secure a place for Tehriq-e-Hurriyat in the talks to decide the fate of J&K on the ground that the secessionist outfit was the true representative of ‘Kashmiris’.
Those behind the plan have gone about its execution with clinical precision. Hasimuddin had been managing the funds of Tehriq-e-Hurriyat after he was ousted from the All Party Hurriyat Conference, as its secretary. But Geelani had replaced him recently. The outfit was getting funds from the ISI and also from Saudi Arabia. Most of the funds were routed through the US-based Kashmir American Council of Ghulam Nabi Fai or the UK-based Ayub Thakar who died recently, sources said. [Times of India]
The arrest of Mr. Fai only confirms what India knows about how the ISI plays the game on Kashmir; with a mixture of subterfuge, political grandstanding, and of course, sub-convential warfare against India, through a network of carefully cultivated intermediaries and proxies.